18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
14
15
1
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
225
64

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison