18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
15
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
225
34

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison