Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Ecsta PS71

Potenza Sport

8.7

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Potenza Sport

Number of tests

14

15

23

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

9.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

225

187

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Dry steering response

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

Dry driving behavior

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2025	225/40 R18	View

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison