Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Ventus Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.7

R17 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Number of tests

14

3

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

3.3

4.0

Latest test

2026

Available sizes

153

60

54

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison