18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
14
3
2
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
3.3
1.5
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
60
65

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Dunlop Winter
63%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison