Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

14

3

11

3

5

Best position

#8

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

3.3

11.6

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

153

40

121

34

63

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison