18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
3
36
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
3.3
3.1
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2023
2025
Available sizes
153
40
296
34

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison