Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

14

5

18

1

3

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

2.2

6.1

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

153

63

47

64

34

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison