Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

14

5

3

2

Best position

#8

#1

#2

#1

Average position

13.4

2.2

3.7

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

63

34

40

23

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison