18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
16
10
3
3
Best position
#8
#3
#2
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
5.5
6.0
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
153
104
40
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison