18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
2
3
Best position
#8
#9
#2
Average position
13.4
9.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
Available sizes
153
64
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
56%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison