18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

We all know the importance of good tyres for optimal safety, performance, and fuel efficiency. Today, let's delve into a comparison between two summer tyres - the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Fulda EcoControl HP2. Brought to you by manufacturers BFGoodrich and Fulda respectively.


The BFGoodrich Advantage scored a 76% rating on our website. Autobild tests positioned this tyre 18th out of 53, crediting it for its comfort and dry handling. ADAC gave it recognition for fuel efficiency, ranking it 9th out of 15. Autobild 2024 praised its dynamic dry handling, quiet rolling noise, and low rolling resistance, all available at a competitive price. However, they noted a tendency for understeering on wet surfaces as a minor drawback.


On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2, which replaced the previous Fulda EcoControl HP model, achieved a 79% rating on our portal. Its test position was quite similar to that of the BFGoodrich Advantage, ranking 20th in Autobild and 8th in the ADAC tests. This tyre made its mark with low exterior noise levels and good performance against cross aquaplaning. Critics at Autobild 2024 applauded it for its strong environmental credentials and satisfactory tire tread wear and efficiency, but marked it down for less balanced performance and weakness on wet tracks.


So, which tyre is better overall? Both score fairly close to each other, both in our ratings and in various independent tests. The BFGoodrich Advantage stands out for its superior dry handling, quiet operation, and cost-effectiveness, but loses points for wet surface handling. On the contrary, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a strong performer in aquaplaning tests and stands out for its lower noise generation, albeit with noted weaknesses under wet conditions.


In conclusion, deciding between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 might boil down to your individual driving conditions and preferences. If you often drive in dry conditions and prioritize comfort and handling, BFGoodrich could be your choice. However, if you want to prioritize efficiency and score environmental points, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 could make the cut despite its slight disadvantage on wet roads.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
14
8
36
Best position
#8
#4
#1
Average position
13.4
12.8
3.1
Latest test
2026
2024
2023
Available sizes
153
30
296

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
55%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
49%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
58%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
50%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 6
77%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
92%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Noise Interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
55%
Fuel Efficiency
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison