18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

If you're looking for detailed comparison between the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre and the Firestone Roadhawk tyre, you've come to the right place. These two summer tyres have been put to the test in a few well-respected comparisons, including Autobild and ADAC. Here, we have summarized those test results as well as our own ratings to provide an actionable verdict.


With an overall rating of 76%, the BFGoodrich Advantage outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk, which has a 72% rating. These percentages cover a range of factors such as comfort, performance in wet and dry conditions, and value for money.


Both tyres have their unique strengths. The BFGoodrich Advantage offers dynamic dry handling, low rolling resistance, low noise level, and a favourable price. But it shows a tendency to understeer in wet conditions. The Firestone Roadhawk performs very well on dry roads, is lightweight, and provides good traction in both wet and dry conditions. However, it could be better balanced as it has weaknesses on wet roads and is the loudest tyre in the test.


Moving on to test positions, in an Autobild test with 53 tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk stood 10th, outperforming the BFGoodrich Advantage which was 18th. On the other hand, in an ADAC test with 16 tyres, while both were placed near the middle of the pack, the Firestone Roadhawk was slightly superior ranking 9th and the BFGoodrich Advantage came 10th.


In conclusion, while both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Firestone Roadhawk are solid choices for summer tyres, according to our ratings and test results, the BFGoodrich Advantage could be a better choice for those who prioritize comfort and value for money, as well as quiet and efficient performance. However, if handling in both dry and wet conditions is your top priority, the Firestone Roadhawk may be more suitable.


For more information on the BFGoodrich Advantage, visit the BFGoodrich official website. If the Firestone Roadhawk has you intrigued, explore it further on Firestone's official website.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
21
3
3
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
11.9
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
164
40
34
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison