18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
3
1
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
3.7
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
34
64
34

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison