18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
14
3
15
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
34
122

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison