18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Dunlop
Winter
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
2
3
Best position
#8
#1
#2
Average position
13.4
1.5
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
65
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison