18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Today we are comparing two popular summer tyres: the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2. According to our ratings, the BFGoodrich Advantage scores a 68%, while the Debica Presto HP2 comes in a little higher at 79%. Let's take a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of these tyres from BFGoodrich and Debica.


Starting with the BFGoodrich Advantage, this tyre has been praised for its comfort and dry handling, with users noting a significant improvement in dry handling. The Autobild tests ranked this tyre 18th out of 53, highlighting its comfort and dry handling capabilities. However, negative aspects include a tendency to understeer in wet conditions.


The Debica Presto HP2 on the other hand, earned its marks for offering a good balance of price and value. In the Autobild test, it took the 16th spot out of 53 tyres tested. Positive traits highlighted include its good environmental profile, solid performance in terms of wear, and efficiency. The tyre, however, showed some weaknesses around driving safety, resulting in a slightly lower balanced performance.


When tested by ADAC, the BFGoodrich Advantage finished 21st out of 50, while the Debica Presto HP2 finished a bit higher on the 15th spot. So, if we consider the overall test rankings, the Debica Presto HP2 seems to be the preferred choice between the two. But of course, the final choice should always be based on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver.


To summarize, both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2 present their own unique benefits. The BFGoodrich Advantage excels in dry handling but struggles a bit in wet conditions. The Debica Presto HP2 offers good value for money, efficiency, and wear performance but it too has its drawbacks, especially around driving safety. Therefore, whilst the Debica Presto HP2 ranks higher in tests overall, both tyres could be a suitable choice depending on your personal needs and local driving conditions.


Neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model and both continue to be trusted choices amongst drivers worldwide. In case you're not quite sure yet, we recommend checking out some more individual reviews from users of these tyres, or use our comparison tool for a comprehensive evaluation of various tyre models from different manufacturers.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica
Presto HP2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
14
5
3
3
5
Best position
#8
#4
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
12.8
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
16
40
34
63

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Debica Presto HP2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Debica Presto HP2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Debica Presto HP2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Debica Presto HP2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Debica Presto HP2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Debica Presto HP2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison