18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Today we are comparing two popular summer tyres: the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2. According to our ratings, the BFGoodrich Advantage scores a 68%, while the Debica Presto HP2 comes in a little higher at 79%. Let's take a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of these tyres from BFGoodrich and Debica.


Starting with the BFGoodrich Advantage, this tyre has been praised for its comfort and dry handling, with users noting a significant improvement in dry handling. The Autobild tests ranked this tyre 18th out of 53, highlighting its comfort and dry handling capabilities. However, negative aspects include a tendency to understeer in wet conditions.


The Debica Presto HP2 on the other hand, earned its marks for offering a good balance of price and value. In the Autobild test, it took the 16th spot out of 53 tyres tested. Positive traits highlighted include its good environmental profile, solid performance in terms of wear, and efficiency. The tyre, however, showed some weaknesses around driving safety, resulting in a slightly lower balanced performance.


When tested by ADAC, the BFGoodrich Advantage finished 21st out of 50, while the Debica Presto HP2 finished a bit higher on the 15th spot. So, if we consider the overall test rankings, the Debica Presto HP2 seems to be the preferred choice between the two. But of course, the final choice should always be based on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver.


To summarize, both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2 present their own unique benefits. The BFGoodrich Advantage excels in dry handling but struggles a bit in wet conditions. The Debica Presto HP2 offers good value for money, efficiency, and wear performance but it too has its drawbacks, especially around driving safety. Therefore, whilst the Debica Presto HP2 ranks higher in tests overall, both tyres could be a suitable choice depending on your personal needs and local driving conditions.


Neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model and both continue to be trusted choices amongst drivers worldwide. In case you're not quite sure yet, we recommend checking out some more individual reviews from users of these tyres, or use our comparison tool for a comprehensive evaluation of various tyre models from different manufacturers.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica
Presto HP2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
14
5
3
Best position
#8
#4
#2
Average position
13.4
12.8
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
153
16
34

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Debica Presto HP2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Debica Presto HP2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Debica Presto HP2
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison