18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Debica Presto HP2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Today we are comparing two popular summer tyres: the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2. According to our ratings, the BFGoodrich Advantage scores a 68%, while the Debica Presto HP2 comes in a little higher at 79%. Let's take a closer look at the strengths and weaknesses of these tyres from BFGoodrich and Debica.


Starting with the BFGoodrich Advantage, this tyre has been praised for its comfort and dry handling, with users noting a significant improvement in dry handling. The Autobild tests ranked this tyre 18th out of 53, highlighting its comfort and dry handling capabilities. However, negative aspects include a tendency to understeer in wet conditions.


The Debica Presto HP2 on the other hand, earned its marks for offering a good balance of price and value. In the Autobild test, it took the 16th spot out of 53 tyres tested. Positive traits highlighted include its good environmental profile, solid performance in terms of wear, and efficiency. The tyre, however, showed some weaknesses around driving safety, resulting in a slightly lower balanced performance.


When tested by ADAC, the BFGoodrich Advantage finished 21st out of 50, while the Debica Presto HP2 finished a bit higher on the 15th spot. So, if we consider the overall test rankings, the Debica Presto HP2 seems to be the preferred choice between the two. But of course, the final choice should always be based on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver.


To summarize, both the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Debica Presto HP2 present their own unique benefits. The BFGoodrich Advantage excels in dry handling but struggles a bit in wet conditions. The Debica Presto HP2 offers good value for money, efficiency, and wear performance but it too has its drawbacks, especially around driving safety. Therefore, whilst the Debica Presto HP2 ranks higher in tests overall, both tyres could be a suitable choice depending on your personal needs and local driving conditions.


Neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model and both continue to be trusted choices amongst drivers worldwide. In case you're not quite sure yet, we recommend checking out some more individual reviews from users of these tyres, or use our comparison tool for a comprehensive evaluation of various tyre models from different manufacturers.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica
Presto HP2
Number of tests
14
5
Best position
#8
#4
Average position
13.4
12.8
Latest test
2026
2024
Available sizes
153
16

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
62%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Debica
Presto HP2
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
51%
Debica Presto HP2
67%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Debica Presto HP2
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Debica Presto HP2
87%
Dry Performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
75%
Debica
Presto HP2
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Debica Presto HP2
66%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
92%
Debica Presto HP2
84%
Comfort & Noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
68%
Debica
Presto HP2
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
73%
Debica Presto HP2
64%
Economy
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Debica Presto HP2
66%
Debica
Presto HP2
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Debica Presto HP2
63%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Debica Presto HP2
69%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison