18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

On our tyre tests database, we present to you data on two summer tyres, the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Cooper Zeon CS8. The data compiled here is based on numerous tests, analyzed and verified to provide reliable information for potential tyre users. The aim is to give an accurate verdict on these tyres, revealing their strengths and weaknesses.


The BFGoodrich Advantage<\/a>, manufactured by BFGoodrich<\/a>, obtained a rating of 76% from us. In the Autobild tests, this tyre secured 18th and 21st position out of 53 and 50 tyres tested respectively. Its top features include good comfort and dry handling. The BFGoodrich Advantage displayed dynamic dry handling teamed with a quiet rolling noise, and low rolling resistance. The price point is also reasonably affordable. However, it seems to have a tendency to understeer in wet conditions and some limitations with handling and braking distances in the wet as well.


On the other hand, the Cooper Zeon CS8 is manufactured in Great Britain by Cooper<\/a> and received a rating of 56% from us. In the Autobild tests, it was positioned 26th and 33rd out of 53 and 50 tyres respectively. This tyre displayed good performance on wet roads but it was marked down for its poor dry performance and low efficiency. It also showed significant weaknesses in terms of mileage and wear, and its overall environmental footprint seems to be an issue as well.


If we look at the tests results, the BFGoodrich Advantage performs better overall than the Cooper Zeon CS8. Neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model till now.


Consequently, if you place a higher emphasis on better dry handling and more comfort, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be the better choice for you. However, if wet condition performance stands as a priority for you, and you are willing to compromise on the tyre's dry handling, efficiency, mileage, and wear, then you might want to go for the Cooper Zeon CS8.


Please note that personal preference varies, and therefore, it is important to consider which features matter to you the most before making a decision.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
14
14
18
3
14
Best position
#8
#9
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
19.7
6.1
3.7
5.5
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
145
47
34
706

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Dry steering response
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison