Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

14

2

3

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

153

23

40

60

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison