Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

14

2

3

Best position

#8

#1

#2

Average position

13.4

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

153

23

40

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Wet side guide

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry performance

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Dry lane changing

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry driving behavior

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Interior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Fuel efficiency

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison