18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Today we're comparing two summer tyres, the BFGoodrich Advantage, made by BFGoodrich, and the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, produced by Barum. Based on our rating system, the BFGoodrich tyre has a higher score (68 percent) compared to the Barum tyre (39 percent).


According to the ADAC test data, out of 50 tyres, the BFGoodrich Advantage held the 21st position, whereas the Barum Bravuris 5 HM was positioned slightly lower at 24th. Similarly, in the Autobild tests, BFGoodrich Advantage was placed 18th out of 53, and Barum Bravuris 5 HM held 29th place.


In terms of features, the BFGoodrich Advantage shines in comfort and dry handling according to Autobild. The 2022 Autobild report praised BFGoodrich’s stability and short braking distances on dry conditions and its pleasingly quiet comfort. However, it pointed out weaknesses, such as understeering behaviour and extended braking distances in wet conditions.


Unfortunately, the data we have doesn't provide specific strengths or weaknesses for the Barum Bravuris 5 HM. Nonetheless, given its lower ranking in the tests compared to the BFGoodrich Advantage, it could be inferred that it may not perform as well overall.


In conclusion, based on the overall test results, the BFGoodrich Advantage seems to rank higher in comparison to the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, particularly in terms of dry handling and ride comfort. However, its performance in wet conditions could be an area for improvement. As for the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, while it ranks lower in the tests, its specific strengths and weaknesses are yet to be identified in the data provided. Users seeking a more comprehensive understanding should refer to individual test reports for detailed insights.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Barum
Bravuris 5 HM
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
14
8
15
Best position
#8
#8
#2
Average position
13.4
26.4
9.0
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
Available sizes
153
161
225

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
58%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison