Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage SUV

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Advantage SUV

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

2

3

2

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

6.5

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

25

34

23

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Offroad

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

78%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

BFGoodrich Advantage SUV

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Advantage SUV

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison