Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO PZ4

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

P ZERO PZ4

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

1

14

15

Best position

#13

#2

Average position

13.0

5.5

9.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

706

225

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

ACTIVAN WINTER

P ZERO PZ4

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison