Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO PZ4

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

P ZERO PZ4

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

14

1

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

5.5

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

706

64

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook ION Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

P ZERO PZ4

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison