Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Pirelli

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

4

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

—

34

Wet

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Cinturato (C3)

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison