Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Pirelli

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

CARRIER WINTER

Comtrac 2 Winter

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#13

#2

#4

#8

Average position

13.0

2.0

4.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

36

13

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

69%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

79%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

80%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

88%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

72%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

82%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

82%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

75%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

53%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

83%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

50%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

42%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

81%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

81%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

81%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

64%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

56%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

51%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

60%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

83%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

79%

Vredestein

Comtrac 2 Winter

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

87%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

80%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

ACTIVAN WINTER

CARRIER WINTER

Comtrac 2 Winter

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison