Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

R14 – R17

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

CARRIER WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

10

Best position

#13

#2

Average position

13.0

2.0

6.0

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

15

36

104

Wet

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Snow

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

73%

Dry

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Comfort

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Costs

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Ice

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

ACTIVAN WINTER

CARRIER WINTER

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison