18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
14
6
Best position
#13
#1
#3
Average position
13.0
5.6
4.7
Latest test
2019
2023
2026
Available sizes
15
47
146

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison