18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
14
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
5.6
3.7
Latest test
2019
2023
2025
Available sizes
15
47
34

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison