18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Nokian
WetProof
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
14
26
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
5.6
2.2
Latest test
2019
2023
2026
Available sizes
15
47
66

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison