18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Nokian WetProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (60%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
1
14
Best position
#13
#1
Average position
13.0
5.6
Latest test
2019
2023
Available sizes
15
47

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Nokian WetProof
91%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Nokian WetProof
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Nokian WetProof
69%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Nokian WetProof
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison