Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

3

5

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

4.7

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

126

63

34

Wet

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison