18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
13
6
3
Best position
#13
#1
#3
#2
Average position
13.0
4.3
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
123
146
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison