18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
13
3
33
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
4.3
3.7
4.1
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
123
34
658

Wet

Wet
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison