Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 5

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Pilot Sport 5

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

1

14

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

3.4

3.3

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

15

70

60

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

Pilot Sport 5

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison