Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

7

3

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

2.4

3.7

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

137

34

Wet

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

94%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

64%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison