18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
4
13
3
1
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
12.0
4.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
123
34
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison