18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
15
3
Best position
#13
#3
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
225
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison