18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
4
3
Best position
#13
#3
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
111
60

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison