Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

1

4

1

14

Best position

#13

#3

#1

#2

Average position

13.0

12.0

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

111

64

706

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison