18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
4
18
1
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
12.0
6.1
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
15
111
47
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison