18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
4
3
2
Best position
#13
#3
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
34
23

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison