Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Number of tests

1

4

3

23

Best position

#13

#3

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

12.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

111

34

188

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison