Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

4

3

Best position

#13

#3

#2

Average position

13.0

12.0

3.7

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

111

34

Wet

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison