18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
2
3
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
23
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison