18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
26
3
Best position
#13
#3
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
111
66
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison