18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
1
4
23
Best position
#13
#3
#1
Average position
13.0
12.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
111
188

Wet

Wet
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%

Dry

Dry
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Costs

Costs
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison