Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

Upper-middle

Kumho

PorTran CW51

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

AGILIS ALPIN

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#13

#3

#8

Average position

13.0

3.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

23

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

73%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

72%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

80%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

80%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

84%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

86%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

62%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

87%

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

ACTIVAN WINTER

AGILIS ALPIN

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison